It is not unusual for Peter Ruckman to stretch the limits of credulity in the many questionable claims he makes in his writings and audio teachings. On this occasion, we have selected four examples for your consideration.
Impossible claim #1. Driving over a narrow bridge with two wheels suspended in the air while being threatened by the KKK.
This assertion comes from one of his Bible commentaries, of all places:
I was driving around, and the KKK was threatening me because they figured I must be sort of a white Martin Luther king [sic] or something; but I wasn’t … Well, I came down a dirt road at about 35 miles an hour and suddenly was confronted with a single track [sic] wooden bridge. It was about twenty feet long and had no railing. As I got to within twenty feet of it and started to cross it a carload of drunk Afro-Americans (that is not the “plenary, verbally inspired original” but it will do!) came tearing around a corner opposite the bridge at about 45 miles an hour. I was too close to turn or brake, and there was room on the bridge for only one car, so I gunned it so that my car would swing out to the right and lean as much as possible in crossing. The other guy braked (much too late) and took the inside. Those cars must have gone by each other on that bridge with both sets of outside wheels in the air; the cars never scraped. I parked my car fifty yards down the road after the “near miss” and went back to look at that bridge and measure it. There was no way that two cars could pass on that bridge with all of both cars on the bridge at the same time. No way in the world. Even with the wheels hanging over, they couldn’t have passed without scraping together unless the wheels were something like two feet beyond the edges of the bridge when they went past. (Ruckman, Peter. The Book of Hebrews. Pensacola, FL: Bible Baptist Bookstore, 1986, p. 29)
That Ruckman would claim the KKK was ever threatening him is laughable in light of his racist views (which are nothing to laugh about). See Examples of racism in Ruckman’s writings. Ruckman does not state outright that he was being chased by the KKK at this very moment, but by leading the story with being threatened by them provides that impression. It seems that if the KKK ever chased him down, it would have been to pat him on the back and congratulate him for his racist writings. They would also congratulate him for referring to blacks with the offensive N word, for believing in “Shemitic supremacy,” for portraying them as “eating dog food,” as well as clay, for complaining about “trying to mix races in washrooms,” and for having made positive remarks at times about slavery. The KKK threat element of the story sounds more impossible than driving through a bridge with two wheels suspended in the air! He has other versions of the same story, with one having both cars going 50 mph as they passed on the bridge. (Ruckman, Peter. The “Errors” in the King James Bible. Pensacola, Bible Baptist Bookstore, 1999, p. 83)
Impossible claim #2. Leading a man to Christ while Ruckman was in one car and the man in another while preaching over a mobile loudspeaker and giving an invitation while driving 60 MPH at 3 AM.
I led a man to Christ one time with me in one car and him in the other and both of us driving about 60 m.p.h. at night (I used a PA system on top of my car to give him the invitation.) (Ruckman, Peter. The Local Church, p. 118)
Another source adds more details to the story:
My buddies and I used to drive through the country in North and South Carolina at 11:00 at night and get on that megaphone and say, “Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh” (Matt. 24:44). The lights popped on in all those farmhouses off the road. That was a lot of fun.
… But one night, traveling along about midnight, a car whipped around us and then slowed down to fifty miles an hour so he would be right in front of us. … I preached him a message on the White Throne Judgment over the speakers, and then I put that quartet on singing “Softly and Tenderly Jesus is Calling.” Then I said over that microphone, “Have you ever accepted Jesus Christ as your Saviour? If you have, please blink your lights.” No blink. I then said, “If you are willing to accept Jesus Christ as your Saviour, please blink your lights.” No blink. After a minute or two, he drove off down a side road. But about three o’clock in the morning, here he came again: same car, same license plate. He passed us and traveled right in front of us at fifty miles an hour, just as he had done before. So I got back on the mike and gave it to him again: I preached on the unpardonable sin. At the end, I gave the same invitation. “If you have ever received Jesus Christ as your Saviour, blink your lights.” No blink. “If you will receive Jesus Christ as your Saviour, blink your lights.” And there was a pause of about five seconds, and he blinked his lights three times. There wasn’t another car in any direction for fifteen miles. With that, he shot off, and we never saw him again. You say, “Do you expect to meet that fellow in heaven?” I do. (Bible Believers' Bulletin. March 2021, pp. 8-9)
Perhaps we should not label this one as impossible, as God works in mysterious ways—however, if anything remotely close to this happened, the details sound highly embellished. Waking people up at 11 at night on country roads to witness to them over a megaphone, preaching at 3:00 AM while driving 60 MPH makes no sense, and even less sense not to pull over together if a person in another vehicle was indeed so interested in the Gospel.
Impossible claim #3. Claiming to have been a Bible believer when he showed up on the campus at Bob Jones University when he still hadn’t shaken off his belief in evolution.
Observe this first:
…I came out of BJU as a Bible believer—that was what I was when I came on the campus… (Ruckman, Peter. The Scholarship Only Controversy. 1996, p. 380)
Now compare the above to this:
…I did not completely shake off my belief in evolution until October of 1949. I had been attending Bob Jones University about four months. (Ruckman, Peter. The Books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Pensacola, FL: Bible Baptist Bookstore, 2004, p. 13)
New Christians who grew up being taught evolution could face some struggles that a newborn Christian who grew up in church could not understand. But in an unguarded moment, Ruckman admits he “hadn’t shaken off his belief in evolution” for several months while at other times portraying himself as such a strong Bible believer the entire time that he was challenging his own teachers within two years:
In 1951, I used verses 1-2 [Prov. 18:1-2] to shake up the graduate faculty of the Seminary at Bob Jones University so badly they never got over it—literally. (Ruckman Reference Bible, First edition, p. 882)
Impossible claim #4. Claiming that a man literally moved a mountain.
If possible, every Christian in the Laodicean church (1900-1990) should read the life of Billy Bray—especially about the time he literally moved a mountain and the time he gave away his last cent… (Ruckman, Peter. History of the New Testament Church Vol. 2, 1984, p. 69)
Ruckman’s assertion that someone literally moved a mountain caught our attention. We traced the footnote he provided, and it led to a book title with no page number listed. We read through the entire book, and did not find a statement or story of Billy Bray moving a mountain. The only anecdote that even came remotely close was the following which we reproduce here for the benefit of our readers:
Mr. Gilbert says he has heard that in coming home from the mine on one occasion, soon after his conversion, Billy was thinking of several recent accidents, which had proved fatal to some of his acquaintances. On getting near a "shaft" where one or two persons had been killed, Billy's mind became possessed with the thought (he was not altogether free from the superstitions which still linger among persons of his class) that they would appear to him from the invisible world. His fears were greatly excited, and though, like many other troubles, quite imaginary, they were none the less terrible to endure. But he passed the place in safety, and of course saw nothing. On coming near another "shaft," he thought of one or two persons who had been killed there, and he trembled with the thought that he should see them. But he kept on his way, struggling with his emotions as best he could. In passing this second "shaft," he had to cross a bridge. Just as he was about to step on it, it came into his mind that the "devil himself" would meet him on the bridge. This thought thoroughly aroused him, and he exclaimed, "The devil! who is he? what can he do? The devil is a fallen angel!…" (Bourne, F. W. The King's son: or, A memoir of Billy Bray. London: Bible Christian Book-Room, 1887, p. 77)
That Ruckman would make such an outstanding claim of someone and not even bother to list a page number for his source is unthinkable. He has an earned doctorate, so he knows better. We were not able to locate the exact edition of the book listed in the footnote, but not being a lengthy book, we proceeded to read an older edition of the same book in its entirety. We find it highly doubtful or impossible that if such a miracle were to be attributed to the subject of a biography, that it would be entirely missing in an older edition of the same book.
As we have documented throughout this website, Ruckman is not a reliable source to read after. To those who defend him and object to our conclusions of his untrustworthiness, our response shall be to simply continue to add to the mounting evidence that his writings and teachings cannot be trusted.
I have heard heard Ruckman make all of these claims with the exception of #4. I had never heard that one before but it doesn't surprise me in the least. If I did not read these claims in his bible believers commentary series, I certainly heard him in audio format telling these stories in his classroom. They're all claims he actually made. Completely outrageous.
I don't remeber what class he was teaching, but I remember Ruckman claiming one time that God had spoken audibly to him as he was in earnest prayer about a situation in his life. He told his class that he heard God speak these words to him audibly: "I have heard thee". Of course, God is going to speak to Peter Ruckman in the king's english. These were words he claimed that God actually spoke to him in an answer to prayer.
I'm not here to say whether that is or isn't true, or whether it actually happened. But in my personal opinion, I am skeptical of anyone who claims that God speaks to them in an audible voice.
And as ferociously as Ruckman attatcked the charasmatics for their antics and extra biblical revelation and their out of control church services, his cult certainly bears many of the earmarks of their sect of Christianity.
Unfortunatley, I have heard other Ruckmanite preachers tell these same stories to their congregations as they believe everything he says, no matter how outrageous the claim. Brainwashed to the Nth degree.
When notorious liar Ruckman said his account or at least that portion was not "the plenary, verbally-inspired original, but it will do," is he admitting to altering his story to fit his fables? How can we trust a liar, a talebearer if this is so?
Are y'all just jealous or what?
There is nothing to be envious about in regards to a man who will willingly & knowingly make impossible claims as a bible teacher. Who has great influence over others, and who also claims to be filled with the Holy Spirit and regenerated.
It sends off alarm bells and red flags in my mind, a sense of shame and embarrasment, because Ruckman carries the name Christian and Baptist, as do his followers who are eagerly willing to duplicate his attitude and false teachings. Christians are supposed to be people of truth, sobriety, and temperance instead of being preoccupied with the sensational and irrational way off in left field somewhere as Ruckman so often finds himself.
Jealousy is not the motivation for bringing this man's claims into the light, but rather, a sense of responsibilty to warn others not to be deceived but such irrationality & bizarre claims that do not edify but draw attention to Ruckman instead of Christ and mislead.
I checked an appendix in his reference bible (#72 – The origin of Heresies) which gives a list of corruptions in modern versions, and almost half of the verses listed absolutely no discernable difference. You have to double check Ruckman when you read what he says